Purpose
This page is intended as a tool for reviewers (or applicants) to request a second opinion with regards to any issues, conflicts, or differences of opinions which may arise during the code review process.
Process
To request a second opinion, please add a comment to this page, along with a link to the Project Application in question and a brief description of the the situation for which you are requesting input from a second reviewer. Adding this as a comment should cause the 'new' tag to appear next to the page title in the Group's main page, thus alerting reviewers that a new request has been submitted.
If the situation is one that can be resolved easily, then the second reviewer should respond in the project application issue queue; and either reviewer should add a response to the comment thread on this page indicating that the issue has been resolved.
If the situation is more complex (ie. a situation for which no previous precedent has been set), then in the interest of not taking over this page for a single issue, please start a new thread in the g.d.o group to host the actual discussion until a resolution has been identified; and add a link to that g.d.o thread below the request on this page. Once the resolution has been determined, update both the project application issue and the thread on this page to indicate that the issue has been resolved.
TODO: Confirm whether updating a wiki page results in the 'updated' tag ... would editing the actual page serve as a cleaner alternative to multiple comment threads?
Requests
Post your 'second opinion requests' below. Be concise, but be sure to include enough information that other reviewers can understand the context of your request.
Example:
Project Application: IPv4 Address Entity
Link: http://drupal.org/node/1172058#comment-4623134
Issue: Looking for a second opinion regarding whether this passes the module duplication test.