Given where things are and what is going on, I would like to propose the following:
We have a first draft of the code review process by DrupalCon London. This includes documentation for both applicant and reviewer. Currently, there is some specific discussion happening here. Specifically, this would include the following:
- Code review goals
- Specific workflow documentation (tags, issues)
- Simple documentation for applicants
- Simple documentation for reviews
We also need to set up a review period. As I said it should be a draft, a living document, and we need to have intervals for more formalized reviews. See this page.
Thoughts?